Compliance Metric · NIL Risk Surface
NIL Fair Market Value Variance
Each collective deal is compared against an estimated FMV. A high inflation ratio for one gender — especially for non-star athletes — signals "pay-for-play" disguised as NIL, exposing the institution to facilitation liability.
§ 106.41(c)(10) · § 106.37(c)
Inflation ratio distribution by sex
Deal value ÷ FMV — 1.0 = market
Deal value vs FMV scatter
Selected year · diagonal = market parity
Mean inflation by depth chart
Hypothesis: male backups just under manual-review threshold
Manual-review activity
Triggered vs cleared deals
Highest-variance deals — institutional risk register
Top 15 NIL deals by inflation ratio
How FMV monitoring protects the institution
NIL collectives are technically third-party. But when the institution provides marketing staff, photographers, or contract review, that participation can be classified as "support services" under § 106.41(c)(10). The dashboard surfaces gender imbalances in inflation ratios so the AD can document a content-neutral support posture before an OCR review.